Level 10 Coaching
    Scaling Up Coaching

    Scaling Up for Independent Financial Advisors and RIAs

    Most advisor-owned firms hit a ceiling that has nothing to do with talent. Production is fine, the AUM Book keeps growing, and the owner is still the bottleneck on every decision that matters. Scaling Up is the operating system that fixes that - a proven system used by over 80,000 firms worldwide to master the four decisions every company must get right.

    01

    Why the four decisions fit an advisor-owned firm

    An advisor-owned firm grows on relationships, then stalls on structure. Revenue sits with a few people, the Business Mix drifts year to year, and nobody owns the numbers between the owner and the client. Scaling Up gives you one page for strategy, a short list of priorities, and a meeting rhythm that surfaces problems while they are still small. The framework was not built for financial services, which is part of why it works - it forces you to run the firm as a business with its own scoreboard, not as a collection of individual producers. People, strategy, execution, and cash get equal weight.

    02

    What the coaching engagement looks like

    Erik works with you and your leadership team. The work is hands-on, results-driven, and tailored to your own challenges and aspirations - which in a smaller firm usually means starting with the two or three things actually blocking growth. Scaling Up's own rhythm is a one-page plan, quarterly priorities with named owners, and a weekly and quarterly cadence that keeps it honest. The plan lives with your team rather than in a binder. The aim is for that rhythm to stop feeling like an addition to the calendar and start being how the firm runs.

    03

    Who Erik predominantly works with

    Erik coaches business owners and leadership teams. Published client testimonials include Authentikos Advisory, Nuventure Financial Group, and Mosley Wealth Management - independent advisory firms where the growth barriers repeat: a founder who is still the rainmaker, a second layer of leaders who have never been asked to own numbers, and Team Headcount added before anybody defined the roles. If you run a general business, the frameworks still apply as written. If you run an advisor firm, you will not spend the first conversation explaining how your revenue works.

    The Framework

    The four decisions

    People - the first of the four decisions
    People

    People: right seats, not just more headcount

    Advisor firms tend to hire for relief rather than for a defined seat. Someone is drowning, so Team Headcount goes up, and six months later the same work is still landing on the owner. The People decision asks harder questions. Who is accountable for each function. Which seats are filled by someone who is good at the job and wants it. Where a strong producer is being asked to manage people, badly, because there was nobody else. The People decision aims at attracting, developing and retaining the right people in the right seats - and it starts by naming the seats.

    Strategy - the second of the four decisions
    Strategy

    Strategy: a Business Mix you chose on purpose

    Ask most owners who they serve best and you get a list of everyone they have ever served. That is not a strategy, it is a history. The Strategy decision forces you to say what you do that competitors do not, who it is for, and what you will decline. For an advisor firm that usually means confronting the Business Mix directly: which segments actually pay for the service model you have built, and which ones quietly consume it. What the Strategy decision aims at is a differentiated strategy that drives sustainable revenue growth - written down, in language your team can repeat.

    Execution - the third of the four decisions
    Execution

    Execution: a scoreboard outside the owner's head

    Execution is where advisor firms leak the most. New Clients arrive through a process only the founder can run. Production is tracked at the firm level and nowhere else. Reviews happen when somebody remembers. The Execution decision installs a small number of metrics each function owns, a weekly meeting that takes minutes rather than hours, and a quarterly reset where priorities either got done or did not. Every recurring meeting has a price tag - most of it invisible. The Execution decision aims at a culture of discipline and accountability that delivers flawless results, and it shows you quickly when that is not happening.

    Cash - the fourth of the four decisions
    Cash

    Cash: fund the growth before you need it

    Recurring revenue makes a firm feel financially safe, and that feeling hides a lot. Hiring ahead of revenue, a new office, a technology migration, an owner draw nobody has reset in years - each one moves cash in ways the top line does not show. The Cash decision has you look at how long a dollar takes to come back to you, what growth actually costs, and how much cushion the firm carries. What the Cash decision aims at is plain: generating the cash needed to fuel growth and weather any storm, so a good year of hiring does not create a hard one.

    Testimonials

    Working with Erik in the Scaling Up program has been an absolute game changer for our business. We have made more progress in the 1 year of working with Erik than we ever thought possible and have a clear vision of what we need to do next and where we are going over the next 5 years thanks to his coaching and guidance. He does an amazing job of training, guiding discussion, and distilling complex issues into the steps needed to make progress across the organization.
    Jared Elson
    CEO, Authentikos Advisory
    Working with Erik through the Scaling Up program has been transformational for Mosley Wealth Management. In just a few short months, we achieved more progress that surpassed our initial assumptions and now have a clear, actionable vision for where we're headed over the next five years. Erik's coaching brings focus and clarity—he has an exceptional ability to guide meaningful discussion, simplify complex challenges, and translate them into practical steps that drive progress across our organization.
    Chris Radford
    CEO, Mosley Wealth Management
    FAQ

    Common questions

    What is Scaling Up coaching for independent financial advisors and RIAs?

    Scaling Up is a growth framework from Verne Harnish - a proven system used by over 80,000 firms worldwide. Coaching applies it to your own firm: one page of strategy, quarterly priorities with named owners, a meeting rhythm that holds them, and metrics each function owns. For an advisor firm, that means growth of the AUM Book stops depending on the owner's memory and starts depending on a system the whole leadership team can run, week after week.

    Do I need a leadership team before starting Scaling Up?

    You need at least two or three people who can own outcomes, not just tasks. A solo owner with nobody to delegate to will get value from the strategy work, but the execution rhythm has nothing to run on. If you have a service lead, an operations lead, and a producer or two, that is enough to start. Part of the early work is often deciding who belongs on the leadership team at all - and the answer is not always seniority.

    How is business coaching different from hiring a consultant?

    A consultant delivers a document. A coach makes you build the thing and then holds you to it. The site describes his approach as hands-on, results-driven, and tailored to each organization's unique challenges and aspirations - work done on your numbers and your priorities rather than delivered as a report you file away. The frameworks are proven and the same for everyone. What gets built with them is yours, and your team has to be able to run it without him in the room.

    Get Started

    See whether the framework fits your firm

    A first conversation is diagnostic, not a pitch. Bring your current numbers, your Business Mix, and the two problems you keep rescheduling. You will leave with a clearer view of whether Scaling Up fits.